Head to head · Survey date: September 2026
Armis vs Oomnitza
Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.
Bottom line
Armis (69) ranks above Oomnitza (62) on our weighted rubric. Armis leads on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, data freshness, query and reporting and deployment effort; Oomnitza leads on remediation and write-back; they tie on price transparency. Neither publishes a price.
Last updated 29 September 2026
How do Armis and Oomnitza score?
| Criterion | Weight | Armis | Oomnitza | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source coverage | 22% | 80 | 68 | Armis |
| Correlation and deduplication | 18% | 74 | 70 | Armis |
| Data freshness | 12% | 88 | 62 | Armis |
| Query and reporting | 12% | 70 | 62 | Armis |
| Remediation and write-back | 14% | 66 | 76 | Oomnitza |
| Deployment effort | 12% | 72 | 64 | Armis |
| Price transparency | 10% | 15 | 15 | Tie |
| Total | 100% | 69 | 62 | Armis |
Armis leads 5 criteria, Oomnitza leads 1, 1 tied.
Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.
Where does each one win?
Tied: price transparency (15 each)
How do pricing and deployment compare?
| Fact | Armis | Oomnitza |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | Not published. Source: armis.com/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026 | Not published. Source: oomnitza.com · Reviewed Sep 2026 |
| Free tier or trial | Not published | Not published |
| Deployment | Cloud platform with no on-premises hardware for the core product; OT/IoT Security is offered as SaaS or on-premises. | Cloud SaaS; integration setup determines time to value. |
| How it builds the inventory | Agentless, passive discovery from network traffic, identified against a knowledgebase of over 6.5 billion assets. | Reconciles procurement, MDM, EDR and ITSM data through its integrations. |
| Integrations as published | 200+ pre-built integrations | 1,500+ data surfaces |
| Coverage grid count | 4.5 of 7 | 4.0 of 7 |
Has ownership changed?
ServiceNow completed its acquisition of Armis on 20 April 2026; Armis Centrix remains available as part of the ServiceNow AI Platform and as a standalone product.
Source: Armis blog, "Welcoming the next chapter: ServiceNow completes Armis acquisition", 20 April 2026 · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which assets does each cover?
| Asset class | Armis | Oomnitza |
|---|---|---|
| Laptops and workstations | Documented | Documented |
| Servers | Partial | Partial |
| Cloud workloads | Documented | Documented |
| SaaS apps | Not documented | Documented |
| Identities | Not documented | Partial |
| OT and IoT | Documented | Not documented |
| Network devices | Documented | Not documented |
| Weighted count (of 7) | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Which one fits your team?
Choose Armis if
- the inventory must reflect changes quickly (Armis 88 vs 62)
- you need the widest documented coverage of asset classes and sources (Armis 80 vs 68)
- Best for OT, IoT and medical device visibility.
Choose Oomnitza if
- findings must become tickets, workflows or corrected records in other systems (Oomnitza 76 vs 66)
- records from several tools must be merged into one trusted record per asset (Oomnitza 70 vs 74)
- Best for hardware and license lifecycle.
Frequently asked questions
Is Armis or Oomnitza better for asset inventory?
On our rubric Armis scores 69 and Oomnitza 62. Armis leads 5 of 7 criteria and Oomnitza leads 1, with 1 tied. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.
Which is cheaper, Armis or Oomnitza?
Armis: Not published. Oomnitza: Not published. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.
Which covers more asset classes, Armis or Oomnitza?
In our coverage grid Armis documents 4.5 of 7 asset classes and Oomnitza 4.0, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.