Asset InventoryRanked

Alternatives · Survey date: September 2026

Lansweeper Alternatives for IT Asset Inventory in 2026

Bottom line

For agentless discovery with a security focus and a published entry price, runZero (72) is the closest alternative to Lansweeper (70). For correlating many security and IT tools into one record, Axonius (76) is the strongest. JupiterOne (73) suits graph queries on published tiers, and Device42 (57) suits data center dependency mapping.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do the alternatives score?

Lansweeper and four alternatives. Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
RankToolSource coverageCorrelation and deduplicationData freshnessQuery and reportingRemediation and write-backDeployment effortPrice transparencyScore
1Axonius9290788682601576
2JupiterOne7472668858689273
3runZero7270806848908272
4Lansweeper7066766450869070
7Device426058706052563557

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Why do teams look for Lansweeper alternatives?

Lansweeper is quick to start and publishes its plans, which is why it scores 86 on deployment effort and 90 on price transparency. Teams usually outgrow it for one of three reasons: they need many security tools correlated into one record, they need SaaS apps and identities inventoried, or they need the inventory to drive actions rather than only feed a service desk.

Which Lansweeper alternatives should you consider?

1. runZero (72)

Choose it over Lansweeper if you want unauthenticated active and passive discovery aimed at security teams, with SaaS, on-premises and air-gapped options.

Dragos announced on 21 September 2026 that it has acquired runZero; runZero continues to serve existing customers.

Read the runZero review

2. Axonius (76)

Choose it over Lansweeper if you need EDR, identity, cloud, SaaS and CMDB data reconciled into one record, and enforcement actions on top. Expect a sales conversation for pricing and more adapter setup.

Read the Axonius review

3. JupiterOne (73)

Choose it over Lansweeper if relationship queries across assets, users and applications matter more than network scanning, and a published annual price from $25,000 fits the budget.

Read the JupiterOne review

4. Device42 (57)

Choose it over Lansweeper if the priority is data center infrastructure, IP address management and application dependency mapping. Device42 is a Freshworks company; pricing is per device, amounts not published.

How does every alternative compare with Lansweeper?

  1. No. 1

    Axonius

    76

    Top pick: correlated asset inventory across many tools

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Source coverage (92 vs 70), Correlation and deduplication (90 vs 66), Data freshness (78 vs 76), Query and reporting (86 vs 64), Remediation and write-back (82 vs 50)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Deployment effort (60 vs 86), Price transparency (15 vs 90)
    • Published pricing: Not published. The homepage offers Get Pricing through sales.
    Read Lansweeper vs Axonius
  2. 73

    Best for graph queries, with published prices

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Source coverage (74 vs 70), Correlation and deduplication (72 vs 66), Query and reporting (88 vs 64), Remediation and write-back (58 vs 50), Price transparency (92 vs 90)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Data freshness (66 vs 76), Deployment effort (68 vs 86)
    • Published pricing: Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points.
    Read Lansweeper vs JupiterOne

  3. No. 3

    runZero

    72

    Best for agentless network discovery

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Source coverage (72 vs 70), Correlation and deduplication (70 vs 66), Data freshness (80 vs 76), Query and reporting (68 vs 64), Deployment effort (90 vs 86)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Remediation and write-back (48 vs 50), Price transparency (82 vs 90)
    • Published pricing: Community Edition free for 100 or fewer assets (30-day retention). runZero Platform starts at $5,000 (3-year retention).
    Read Lansweeper vs runZero

  4. No. 5

    Armis

    69

    Best for OT, IoT and medical device visibility

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Source coverage (80 vs 70), Correlation and deduplication (74 vs 66), Data freshness (88 vs 76), Query and reporting (70 vs 64), Remediation and write-back (66 vs 50)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Deployment effort (72 vs 86), Price transparency (15 vs 90)
    • Published pricing: Not published.
    Read Lansweeper vs Armis

  5. No. 6

    Oomnitza

    62

    Best for hardware and license lifecycle

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Correlation and deduplication (70 vs 66), Remediation and write-back (76 vs 50)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Source coverage (68 vs 70), Data freshness (62 vs 76), Query and reporting (62 vs 64), Deployment effort (64 vs 86), Price transparency (15 vs 90)
    • Published pricing: Not published.
    Read Lansweeper vs Oomnitza

  6. No. 7

    Device42

    57

    Best for data center dependency mapping

    • Beats Lansweeper on: Remediation and write-back (52 vs 50)
    • Lansweeper is stronger on: Source coverage (60 vs 70), Correlation and deduplication (58 vs 66), Data freshness (70 vs 76), Query and reporting (60 vs 64), Deployment effort (56 vs 86), Price transparency (35 vs 90)
    • Published pricing: Annual subscription based on the number of devices; amounts not published.
    Read Lansweeper vs Device42

Last updated 29 September 2026

Which assets do these tools cover?

Asset coverage grid: which asset classes each tool documentsWeighted coverage counts, documented counts one and partial counts one half: Axonius 6.5 of 7; JupiterOne 4.5 of 7; runZero 5.5 of 7; Lansweeper 5.5 of 7; Armis 4.5 of 7; Oomnitza 4.0 of 7; Device42 3.5 of 7.E1AxoniusE2JupiterOneE3runZeroE4LansweeperE7Device42N1Laptops and workstationsLaptops and workstations · Axonius: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · JupiterOne: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · runZero: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · Lansweeper: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN2ServersServers · Axonius: DocumentedDServers · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PServers · runZero: DocumentedDServers · Lansweeper: DocumentedDServers · Device42: DocumentedDN3Cloud workloadsCloud workloads · Axonius: DocumentedDCloud workloads · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PCloud workloads · runZero: DocumentedDCloud workloads · Lansweeper: Partial. Cloud discovery is documented; providers are not named on the product page.PCloud workloads · Device42: DocumentedDN4SaaS appsSaaS apps · Axonius: DocumentedDSaaS apps · JupiterOne: DocumentedDSaaS apps · runZero: Not documented. Not covered on the pages we reviewed.NSaaS apps · Lansweeper: Partial. AI usage tracking only.PSaaS apps · Device42: Partial. Software licenses are tracked; SaaS discovery is not documented.PN5IdentitiesIdentities · Axonius: DocumentedDIdentities · JupiterOne: DocumentedDIdentities · runZero: Partial. Directory data from Entra ID and Active Directory integrations enriches device records.PIdentities · Lansweeper: Partial. User data is merged into asset records.PIdentities · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN6OT and IoTOT and IoT · Axonius: DocumentedDOT and IoT · JupiterOne: Not documented. Not listed among the asset classes on the platform page.NOT and IoT · runZero: DocumentedDOT and IoT · Lansweeper: DocumentedDOT and IoT · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN7Network devicesNetwork devices · Axonius: Partial. Covered through adapters to network tools; the pages we reviewed do not describe a native network scanner.PNetwork devices · JupiterOne: PartialPNetwork devices · runZero: DocumentedDNetwork devices · Lansweeper: DocumentedDNetwork devices · Device42: DocumentedD
DocumentedPartialNot documented

Frequently asked questions

What is the best alternative to Lansweeper?

runZero (72) for agentless discovery aimed at security teams, and Axonius (76) for correlating many tools into one record.

Which Lansweeper alternatives publish prices?

runZero (free up to 100 assets, Platform from $5,000) and JupiterOne (annual tiers from $25,000). Axonius does not publish prices; Device42 publishes its per-device model but not amounts.

When should you stay with Lansweeper?

Lansweeper's strongest criteria on our rubric are deployment effort and price transparency (90 and 86). Stay with Lansweeper when an IT team needs a network, OT and laptop inventory quickly on published plans, feeding an existing service desk.

Related