Asset InventoryRanked

Head to head · Survey date: September 2026

Lansweeper vs Oomnitza

Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.

Bottom line

Lansweeper (70) ranks above Oomnitza (62) on our weighted rubric. Lansweeper leads on source coverage, data freshness, query and reporting, deployment effort and price transparency; Oomnitza leads on correlation and deduplication and remediation and write-back. Lansweeper publishes prices; Oomnitza does not.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do Lansweeper and Oomnitza score?

Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
CriterionWeightLansweeperOomnitzaLeader
Source coverage22%7068Lansweeper
Correlation and deduplication18%6670Oomnitza
Data freshness12%7662Lansweeper
Query and reporting12%6462Lansweeper
Remediation and write-back14%5076Oomnitza
Deployment effort12%8664Lansweeper
Price transparency10%9015Lansweeper
Total100%7062Lansweeper

Lansweeper leads 5 criteria, Oomnitza leads 2.

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Where does each one win?

How do pricing and deployment compare?

Published facts, Lansweeper and Oomnitza. Reviewed September 2026.
FactLansweeperOomnitza
Published pricing

Free up to 100 assets after the trial. Starter (includes 2,000 assets) and Pro (scales to 9,000 assets in bands of 1,000) list prices are published, billed annually. Enterprise is quoted from 10,000 assets.

Source: lansweeper.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Not published.

Source: oomnitza.com · Reviewed Sep 2026

Free tier or trial14 days of full access, then free up to 100 assetsNot published
DeploymentAgentless scanning, an optional IT agent for off-network laptops and a traffic sensor for passive detection.Cloud SaaS; integration setup determines time to value.
How it builds the inventoryAgentless network scanning including OT, an optional agent, cloud discovery and passive detection.Reconciles procurement, MDM, EDR and ITSM data through its integrations.
Integrations as publishedCount not published; lists Jira Service Management, ServiceNow, HaloITSM, Freshservice, TOPdesk, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk and Armis1,500+ data surfaces
Coverage grid count5.5 of 74.0 of 7

Which assets does each cover?

Asset coverage grid: which asset classes each tool documentsWeighted coverage counts, documented counts one and partial counts one half: Axonius 6.5 of 7; JupiterOne 4.5 of 7; runZero 5.5 of 7; Lansweeper 5.5 of 7; Armis 4.5 of 7; Oomnitza 4.0 of 7; Device42 3.5 of 7.E4LansweeperE6OomnitzaN1Laptops and workstationsLaptops and workstations · Lansweeper: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · Oomnitza: DocumentedDN2ServersServers · Lansweeper: DocumentedDServers · Oomnitza: Partial. Physical hardware is covered; servers are not called out.PN3Cloud workloadsCloud workloads · Lansweeper: Partial. Cloud discovery is documented; providers are not named on the product page.PCloud workloads · Oomnitza: DocumentedDN4SaaS appsSaaS apps · Lansweeper: Partial. AI usage tracking only.PSaaS apps · Oomnitza: DocumentedDN5IdentitiesIdentities · Lansweeper: Partial. User data is merged into asset records.PIdentities · Oomnitza: Partial. Okta and Entra integrations feed user data.PN6OT and IoTOT and IoT · Lansweeper: DocumentedDOT and IoT · Oomnitza: Not documented. Not documented.NN7Network devicesNetwork devices · Lansweeper: DocumentedDNetwork devices · Oomnitza: Not documented. Not documented.N
DocumentedPartialNot documented
Asset coverage, Lansweeper and Oomnitza. Status reflects vendor documentation reviewed September 2026.
Asset classLansweeperOomnitza
Laptops and workstationsDocumentedDocumented
ServersDocumentedPartial
Cloud workloadsPartialDocumented
SaaS appsPartialDocumented
IdentitiesPartialPartial
OT and IoTDocumentedNot documented
Network devicesDocumentedNot documented
Weighted count (of 7)5.54.0

Which one fits your team?

Choose Lansweeper if

  • you need a published price to model before a sales call (Lansweeper 90 vs 15)
  • you need a useful inventory with little setup (Lansweeper 86 vs 64)
  • Best for IT teams that want a fast, priced start.

Choose Oomnitza if

  • findings must become tickets, workflows or corrected records in other systems (Oomnitza 76 vs 50)
  • records from several tools must be merged into one trusted record per asset (Oomnitza 70 vs 66)
  • Best for hardware and license lifecycle.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lansweeper or Oomnitza better for asset inventory?

On our rubric Lansweeper scores 70 and Oomnitza 62. Lansweeper leads 5 of 7 criteria and Oomnitza leads 2. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.

Which is cheaper, Lansweeper or Oomnitza?

Lansweeper: Free up to 100 assets after the trial. Starter (includes 2,000 assets) and Pro (scales to 9,000 assets in bands of 1,000) list prices are published, billed annually. Enterprise is quoted from 10,000 assets. Oomnitza: Not published. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.

Which covers more asset classes, Lansweeper or Oomnitza?

In our coverage grid Lansweeper documents 5.5 of 7 asset classes and Oomnitza 4.0, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.

Related