Asset InventoryRanked

Head to head · Survey date: September 2026

Axonius vs JupiterOne

Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.

Bottom line

Axonius (76) ranks above JupiterOne (73) on our weighted rubric. Axonius leads on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, data freshness and remediation and write-back; JupiterOne leads on query and reporting, deployment effort and price transparency. JupiterOne publishes prices; Axonius does not.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do Axonius and JupiterOne score?

Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
CriterionWeightAxoniusJupiterOneLeader
Source coverage22%9274Axonius
Correlation and deduplication18%9072Axonius
Data freshness12%7866Axonius
Query and reporting12%8688JupiterOne
Remediation and write-back14%8258Axonius
Deployment effort12%6068JupiterOne
Price transparency10%1592JupiterOne
Total100%7673Axonius

Axonius leads 4 criteria, JupiterOne leads 3.

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Where does each one win?

How do pricing and deployment compare?

Published facts, Axonius and JupiterOne. Reviewed September 2026.
FactAxoniusJupiterOne
Published pricing

Not published. The homepage offers Get Pricing through sales.

Source: axonius.com · Reviewed Sep 2026

Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points.

Source: jupiterone.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Free tier or trialNot publishedNo free tier or trial mentioned on the pricing page
DeploymentAxonius-hosted SaaS on an AWS EC2 instance separated from other customers' environments, in any EC2 region, or a customer-hosted virtual appliance on the internal network.SaaS with API integrations.
How it builds the inventoryAggregates and correlates data from the tools a company already runs, through adapters.Builds a security graph of assets and relationships from its integrations.
Integrations as published1,200+ adapters200+ pre-built integrations
Coverage grid count6.5 of 74.5 of 7

Which assets does each cover?

Asset coverage grid: which asset classes each tool documentsWeighted coverage counts, documented counts one and partial counts one half: Axonius 6.5 of 7; JupiterOne 4.5 of 7; runZero 5.5 of 7; Lansweeper 5.5 of 7; Armis 4.5 of 7; Oomnitza 4.0 of 7; Device42 3.5 of 7.E1AxoniusE2JupiterOneN1Laptops and workstationsLaptops and workstations · Axonius: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · JupiterOne: DocumentedDN2ServersServers · Axonius: DocumentedDServers · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PN3Cloud workloadsCloud workloads · Axonius: DocumentedDCloud workloads · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PN4SaaS appsSaaS apps · Axonius: DocumentedDSaaS apps · JupiterOne: DocumentedDN5IdentitiesIdentities · Axonius: DocumentedDIdentities · JupiterOne: DocumentedDN6OT and IoTOT and IoT · Axonius: DocumentedDOT and IoT · JupiterOne: Not documented. Not listed among the asset classes on the platform page.NN7Network devicesNetwork devices · Axonius: Partial. Covered through adapters to network tools; the pages we reviewed do not describe a native network scanner.PNetwork devices · JupiterOne: PartialP
DocumentedPartialNot documented
Asset coverage, Axonius and JupiterOne. Status reflects vendor documentation reviewed September 2026.
Asset classAxoniusJupiterOne
Laptops and workstationsDocumentedDocumented
ServersDocumentedPartial
Cloud workloadsDocumentedPartial
SaaS appsDocumentedDocumented
IdentitiesDocumentedDocumented
OT and IoTDocumentedNot documented
Network devicesPartialPartial
Weighted count (of 7)6.54.5

Which one fits your team?

Choose Axonius if

  • findings must become tickets, workflows or corrected records in other systems (Axonius 82 vs 58)
  • you need the widest documented coverage of asset classes and sources (Axonius 92 vs 74)
  • Top pick: correlated asset inventory across many tools.

Choose JupiterOne if

  • you need a published price to model before a sales call (JupiterOne 92 vs 15)
  • you need a useful inventory with little setup (JupiterOne 68 vs 60)
  • Best for graph queries, with published prices.

Frequently asked questions

Is Axonius or JupiterOne better for asset inventory?

On our rubric Axonius scores 76 and JupiterOne 73. Axonius leads 4 of 7 criteria and JupiterOne leads 3. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.

Which is cheaper, Axonius or JupiterOne?

Axonius: Not published. The homepage offers Get Pricing through sales. JupiterOne: Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.

Which covers more asset classes, Axonius or JupiterOne?

In our coverage grid Axonius documents 6.5 of 7 asset classes and JupiterOne 4.5, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.

Related