ALTERNATIVES · SURVEY DATE: SEPTEMBER 2026
JupiterOne Alternatives for Asset Inventory (2026)
Bottom line
The highest-scoring alternatives to JupiterOne (73) on our rubric are Axonius (76), runZero (72) and Lansweeper (70). 1 of them scores higher than JupiterOne overall.
Last updated 29 September 2026
Why do teams look for JupiterOne alternatives?
These are the reasons that follow from JupiterOne's own public pages, reviewed September 2026. They are facts, not complaints we collected.
- The lowest published tier is $25,000 a year, and the pricing page mentions no free tier or trial.
- OT and IoT devices are not listed among its asset classes.
- Alerts and notifications are documented; write-back actions into other systems are not.
- Sync frequency is not published on the pages we reviewed.
Source: jupiterone.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: jupiterone.com/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026
How does every alternative compare with JupiterOne?
- 76
No. 1
Axonius
Top pick: correlated asset inventory across many tools
- Beats JupiterOne on: Source coverage (92 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (90 vs 72), Data freshness (78 vs 66), Remediation and write-back (82 vs 58)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Query and reporting (86 vs 88), Deployment effort (60 vs 68), Price transparency (15 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Not published. The homepage offers Get Pricing through sales.
- 72
No. 3
runZero
Best for agentless network discovery
- Beats JupiterOne on: Data freshness (80 vs 66), Deployment effort (90 vs 68)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Source coverage (72 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (70 vs 72), Query and reporting (68 vs 88), Remediation and write-back (48 vs 58), Price transparency (82 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Community Edition free for 100 or fewer assets (30-day retention). runZero Platform starts at $5,000 (3-year retention).
- 70
No. 4
Lansweeper
Best for IT teams that want a fast, priced start
- Beats JupiterOne on: Data freshness (76 vs 66), Deployment effort (86 vs 68)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Source coverage (70 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (66 vs 72), Query and reporting (64 vs 88), Remediation and write-back (50 vs 58), Price transparency (90 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Free up to 100 assets after the trial. Starter (includes 2,000 assets) and Pro (scales to 9,000 assets in bands of 1,000) list prices are published, billed annually. Enterprise is quoted from 10,000 assets.
- 69
No. 5
Armis
Best for OT, IoT and medical device visibility
- Beats JupiterOne on: Source coverage (80 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (74 vs 72), Data freshness (88 vs 66), Remediation and write-back (66 vs 58), Deployment effort (72 vs 68)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Query and reporting (70 vs 88), Price transparency (15 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Not published.
- 62
No. 6
Oomnitza
Best for hardware and license lifecycle
- Beats JupiterOne on: Remediation and write-back (76 vs 58)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Source coverage (68 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (70 vs 72), Data freshness (62 vs 66), Query and reporting (62 vs 88), Deployment effort (64 vs 68), Price transparency (15 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Not published.
- 57
No. 7
Device42
Best for data center dependency mapping
- Beats JupiterOne on: Data freshness (70 vs 66)
- JupiterOne is stronger on: Source coverage (60 vs 74), Correlation and deduplication (58 vs 72), Query and reporting (60 vs 88), Remediation and write-back (52 vs 58), Deployment effort (56 vs 68), Price transparency (35 vs 92)
- Published pricing: Annual subscription based on the number of devices; amounts not published.
When should you stay with JupiterOne?
JupiterOne has the top score in this ranking on query and reporting and price transparency. Stay with JupiterOne when relationship questions matter most, such as which assets an affected identity can reach, and when a published annual price is a requirement for the purchase.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to JupiterOne?
On our rubric the highest-scoring alternative is Axonius (76), followed by runZero (72). Axonius beats JupiterOne on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, data freshness and remediation and write-back.
Which JupiterOne alternatives publish prices?
runZero and Lansweeper publish prices on the pages we reviewed. Device42 publishes its pricing model but not amounts. Axonius, Armis and Oomnitza do not publish prices.
When should you stay with JupiterOne?
JupiterOne has the top score in this ranking on query and reporting and price transparency. Stay with JupiterOne when relationship questions matter most, such as which assets an affected identity can reach, and when a published annual price is a requirement for the purchase.