Asset InventoryRanked

Head to head · Survey date: September 2026

JupiterOne vs Armis

Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.

Bottom line

JupiterOne (73) ranks above Armis (69) on our weighted rubric. JupiterOne leads on query and reporting and price transparency; Armis leads on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, data freshness, remediation and write-back and deployment effort. JupiterOne publishes prices; Armis does not.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do JupiterOne and Armis score?

Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
CriterionWeightJupiterOneArmisLeader
Source coverage22%7480Armis
Correlation and deduplication18%7274Armis
Data freshness12%6688Armis
Query and reporting12%8870JupiterOne
Remediation and write-back14%5866Armis
Deployment effort12%6872Armis
Price transparency10%9215JupiterOne
Total100%7369JupiterOne

JupiterOne leads 2 criteria, Armis leads 5.

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Where does each one win?

How do pricing and deployment compare?

Published facts, JupiterOne and Armis. Reviewed September 2026.
FactJupiterOneArmis
Published pricing

Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points.

Source: jupiterone.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Not published.

Source: armis.com/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026

Free tier or trialNo free tier or trial mentioned on the pricing pageNot published
DeploymentSaaS with API integrations.Cloud platform with no on-premises hardware for the core product; OT/IoT Security is offered as SaaS or on-premises.
How it builds the inventoryBuilds a security graph of assets and relationships from its integrations.Agentless, passive discovery from network traffic, identified against a knowledgebase of over 6.5 billion assets.
Integrations as published200+ pre-built integrations200+ pre-built integrations
Coverage grid count4.5 of 74.5 of 7

Has ownership changed?

ServiceNow completed its acquisition of Armis on 20 April 2026; Armis Centrix remains available as part of the ServiceNow AI Platform and as a standalone product.

Source: Armis blog, "Welcoming the next chapter: ServiceNow completes Armis acquisition", 20 April 2026 · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which assets does each cover?

Asset coverage grid: which asset classes each tool documentsWeighted coverage counts, documented counts one and partial counts one half: Axonius 6.5 of 7; JupiterOne 4.5 of 7; runZero 5.5 of 7; Lansweeper 5.5 of 7; Armis 4.5 of 7; Oomnitza 4.0 of 7; Device42 3.5 of 7.E2JupiterOneE5ArmisN1Laptops and workstationsLaptops and workstations · JupiterOne: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · Armis: DocumentedDN2ServersServers · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PServers · Armis: Partial. Covered as IT assets; not called out separately.PN3Cloud workloadsCloud workloads · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PCloud workloads · Armis: DocumentedDN4SaaS appsSaaS apps · JupiterOne: DocumentedDSaaS apps · Armis: Not documented. Not documented as asset classes.NN5IdentitiesIdentities · JupiterOne: DocumentedDIdentities · Armis: Not documented. Not documented as asset classes.NN6OT and IoTOT and IoT · JupiterOne: Not documented. Not listed among the asset classes on the platform page.NOT and IoT · Armis: DocumentedDN7Network devicesNetwork devices · JupiterOne: PartialPNetwork devices · Armis: DocumentedD
DocumentedPartialNot documented
Asset coverage, JupiterOne and Armis. Status reflects vendor documentation reviewed September 2026.
Asset classJupiterOneArmis
Laptops and workstationsDocumentedDocumented
ServersPartialPartial
Cloud workloadsPartialDocumented
SaaS appsDocumentedNot documented
IdentitiesDocumentedNot documented
OT and IoTNot documentedDocumented
Network devicesPartialDocumented
Weighted count (of 7)4.54.5

Which one fits your team?

Choose JupiterOne if

  • you need a published price to model before a sales call (JupiterOne 92 vs 15)
  • your team needs to ask coverage questions across every source (JupiterOne 88 vs 70)
  • Best for graph queries, with published prices.

Choose Armis if

  • the inventory must reflect changes quickly (Armis 88 vs 66)
  • findings must become tickets, workflows or corrected records in other systems (Armis 66 vs 58)
  • Best for OT, IoT and medical device visibility.

Frequently asked questions

Is JupiterOne or Armis better for asset inventory?

On our rubric JupiterOne scores 73 and Armis 69. JupiterOne leads 2 of 7 criteria and Armis leads 5. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.

Which is cheaper, JupiterOne or Armis?

JupiterOne: Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Armis: Not published. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.

Which covers more asset classes, JupiterOne or Armis?

JupiterOne and Armis tie at 4.5 of 7 asset classes in our coverage grid, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.

Related