Asset InventoryRanked

Head to head · Survey date: September 2026

JupiterOne vs Device42

Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.

Bottom line

JupiterOne (73) ranks above Device42 (57) on our weighted rubric. JupiterOne leads on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, query and reporting, remediation and write-back, deployment effort and price transparency; Device42 leads on data freshness. JupiterOne publishes prices; Device42 publishes its pricing model but not amounts.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do JupiterOne and Device42 score?

Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
CriterionWeightJupiterOneDevice42Leader
Source coverage22%7460JupiterOne
Correlation and deduplication18%7258JupiterOne
Data freshness12%6670Device42
Query and reporting12%8860JupiterOne
Remediation and write-back14%5852JupiterOne
Deployment effort12%6856JupiterOne
Price transparency10%9235JupiterOne
Total100%7357JupiterOne

JupiterOne leads 6 criteria, Device42 leads 1.

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Where does each one win?

How do pricing and deployment compare?

Published facts, JupiterOne and Device42. Reviewed September 2026.
FactJupiterOneDevice42
Published pricing

Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points.

Source: jupiterone.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Annual subscription based on the number of devices; amounts not published.

Source: device42.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Free tier or trialNo free tier or trial mentioned on the pricing pageFree trial download
DeploymentSaaS with API integrations.Not described on the pages we reviewed; the free trial is a download.
How it builds the inventoryBuilds a security graph of assets and relationships from its integrations.Agentless discovery and dependency mapping from mainframes to cloud containers, SNMP network devices, AWS and Azure.
Integrations as published200+ pre-built integrations30+ integrations
Coverage grid count4.5 of 73.5 of 7

Which assets does each cover?

Asset coverage grid: which asset classes each tool documentsWeighted coverage counts, documented counts one and partial counts one half: Axonius 6.5 of 7; JupiterOne 4.5 of 7; runZero 5.5 of 7; Lansweeper 5.5 of 7; Armis 4.5 of 7; Oomnitza 4.0 of 7; Device42 3.5 of 7.E2JupiterOneE7Device42N1Laptops and workstationsLaptops and workstations · JupiterOne: DocumentedDLaptops and workstations · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN2ServersServers · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PServers · Device42: DocumentedDN3Cloud workloadsCloud workloads · JupiterOne: Partial. Covered through integrations; the platform page lists devices, networks and applications rather than naming server or cloud workload classes.PCloud workloads · Device42: DocumentedDN4SaaS appsSaaS apps · JupiterOne: DocumentedDSaaS apps · Device42: Partial. Software licenses are tracked; SaaS discovery is not documented.PN5IdentitiesIdentities · JupiterOne: DocumentedDIdentities · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN6OT and IoTOT and IoT · JupiterOne: Not documented. Not listed among the asset classes on the platform page.NOT and IoT · Device42: Not documented. Not documented; the product focuses on data center and cloud infrastructure.NN7Network devicesNetwork devices · JupiterOne: PartialPNetwork devices · Device42: DocumentedD
DocumentedPartialNot documented
Asset coverage, JupiterOne and Device42. Status reflects vendor documentation reviewed September 2026.
Asset classJupiterOneDevice42
Laptops and workstationsDocumentedNot documented
ServersPartialDocumented
Cloud workloadsPartialDocumented
SaaS appsDocumentedPartial
IdentitiesDocumentedNot documented
OT and IoTNot documentedNot documented
Network devicesPartialDocumented
Weighted count (of 7)4.53.5

Which one fits your team?

Choose JupiterOne if

  • you need a published price to model before a sales call (JupiterOne 92 vs 35)
  • your team needs to ask coverage questions across every source (JupiterOne 88 vs 60)
  • Best for graph queries, with published prices.

Choose Device42 if

  • the inventory must reflect changes quickly (Device42 70 vs 66)
  • you need the widest documented coverage of asset classes and sources (Device42 60 vs 74)
  • Best for data center dependency mapping.

Frequently asked questions

Is JupiterOne or Device42 better for asset inventory?

On our rubric JupiterOne scores 73 and Device42 57. JupiterOne leads 6 of 7 criteria and Device42 leads 1. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.

Which is cheaper, JupiterOne or Device42?

JupiterOne: Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Device42: Annual subscription based on the number of devices; amounts not published. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.

Which covers more asset classes, JupiterOne or Device42?

In our coverage grid JupiterOne documents 4.5 of 7 asset classes and Device42 3.5, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.

Related