Head to head · Survey date: September 2026

JupiterOne vs Oomnitza

Two asset inventory tools on the same seven criteria.

Bottom line

JupiterOne (73) ranks above Oomnitza (62) on our weighted rubric. JupiterOne leads on source coverage, correlation and deduplication, data freshness, query and reporting, deployment effort and price transparency; Oomnitza leads on remediation and write-back. JupiterOne publishes prices; Oomnitza does not.

Last updated 29 September 2026

How do JupiterOne and Oomnitza score?

Coverage and trust score, editorial assessment, 0-100. Survey date: September 2026.
Criterion	Weight	JupiterOne	Oomnitza	Leader
Source coverage	22%	74	68	JupiterOne
Correlation and deduplication	18%	72	70	JupiterOne
Data freshness	12%	66	62	JupiterOne
Query and reporting	12%	88	62	JupiterOne
Remediation and write-back	14%	58	76	Oomnitza
Deployment effort	12%	68	64	JupiterOne
Price transparency	10%	92	15	JupiterOne
Total	100%	73	62	JupiterOne

JupiterOne leads 6 criteria, Oomnitza leads 1.

Coverage and trust score (editorial assessment, 0-100). It measures how completely and reliably a tool can tell a security or IT team what assets exist, who owns them and what state they are in. It is not a measure of overall product quality: service management platforms and lifecycle tools score lower here because inventory accuracy is one part of what they do.

Where does each one win?

JupiterOne leads

Source coverage: 74 vs 68. 200+ integrations across security, IT, DevOps and HR tools; OT and IoT devices are not documented on the pages we reviewed.
Correlation and deduplication: 72 vs 70. A security graph maps relationships between assets; entity matching depends on the data each integration supplies.
Data freshness: 66 vs 62. Updates arrive through integration syncs; sync frequency is not published on the pages we reviewed.
Query and reporting: 88 vs 62. Graph queries with a pre-built library and natural language questions, plus blast-radius views across relationships.
Deployment effort: 68 vs 64. SaaS with API integrations; useful coverage depends on how many integrations a team configures.
Price transparency: 92 vs 15. Annual list prices published: $25,000, $50,000 and $100,000 tiers by data points.

How do pricing and deployment compare?

Published facts, JupiterOne and Oomnitza. Reviewed September 2026.
Fact	JupiterOne	Oomnitza
Published pricing	Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Source: jupiterone.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026	Not published. Source: oomnitza.com · Reviewed Sep 2026
Free tier or trial	No free tier or trial mentioned on the pricing page	Not published
Deployment	SaaS with API integrations.	Cloud SaaS; integration setup determines time to value.
How it builds the inventory	Builds a security graph of assets and relationships from its integrations.	Reconciles procurement, MDM, EDR and ITSM data through its integrations.
Integrations as published	200+ pre-built integrations	1,500+ data surfaces
Coverage grid count	4.5 of 7	4.0 of 7

Which assets does each cover?

DocumentedPartialNot documented

Asset coverage, JupiterOne and Oomnitza. Status reflects vendor documentation reviewed September 2026.
Asset class	JupiterOne	Oomnitza
Laptops and workstations	Documented	Documented
Servers	Partial	Partial
Cloud workloads	Partial	Documented
SaaS apps	Documented	Documented
Identities	Documented	Partial
OT and IoT	Not documented	Not documented
Network devices	Partial	Not documented
Weighted count (of 7)	4.5	4.0

Which one fits your team?

Choose JupiterOne if

you need a published price to model before a sales call (JupiterOne 92 vs 15)
your team needs to ask coverage questions across every source (JupiterOne 88 vs 62)
Best for graph queries, with published prices.

Choose Oomnitza if

findings must become tickets, workflows or corrected records in other systems (Oomnitza 76 vs 58)
records from several tools must be merged into one trusted record per asset (Oomnitza 70 vs 72)
Best for hardware and license lifecycle.

Frequently asked questions

Is JupiterOne or Oomnitza better for asset inventory?

On our rubric JupiterOne scores 73 and Oomnitza 62. JupiterOne leads 6 of 7 criteria and Oomnitza leads 1. Scores are editorial and weighted as described in the methodology.

Which is cheaper, JupiterOne or Oomnitza?

JupiterOne: Published annual list prices: Small-Market $25,000; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months for up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months for up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1 million data points. Oomnitza: Not published. A like-for-like comparison needs a quote from the vendor that does not publish amounts.

Which covers more asset classes, JupiterOne or Oomnitza?

In our coverage grid JupiterOne documents 4.5 of 7 asset classes and Oomnitza 4.0, counting Documented as 1 and Partial as 0.5.